A book review of Feminist Pedagogy for Teaching Online authored by Dr. Ayesha Perveen was published in the Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning. Thank you Dr. Perveen for taking the time to review our book and your praise as well as thoughtful feedback!
The abstract: “This book review critically examines Feminist Pedagogy for Teaching Online (Howard et al., 2025), identifying it as a crucial intervention that bridges a significant gap in contemporary scholarship by envisioning online learning through the lens of feminist pedagogy. The collection challenges dominant instructional design norms and technological culture, underscoring fundamental values of care, equity, reflexivity, and social justice.
Structured into four thematic parts, the book consistently emphasises praxis, showcasing practical tools like social annotation and cryptoparties to foster equity and collaboration in e-spaces. Its primary strength lies in modelling feminist pedagogical principles through collaborative and student-centred approaches. While praised for its diverse contributions, the review notes some chapters could benefit from more analytical engagement with structural barriers to feminist agency in institutional settings. It acknowledges potential conceptual repetitions for novice readers. Nevertheless, the book is considered a vital resource for all e-learning stakeholders, promoting value-driven, ethical, and transformative online learning environments.”
The review is available open access and you can read it here:
Perveen, A. (2025). Book Review: Feminist Pedagogy for Teaching Online. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 29(1), 151–158.https://doi.org/10.61468/jofdl.v29i1.731
Congrats to Dr. Ashley King, completing a Doctor of Philosophy degree in Education with a concentration in Learning Design and Technology at The University of Tennessee Knoxville, who today successfully defended her dissertation titled “Collaborative Online Learning Mediated Through Concurrent Update Technology in Asynchronous and Synchronous Environments”! Proud of you, Dr. King!
Committee Members: Dr. Enilda Romero-Hall (Chair), Dr. Joshua Rosenberg, Dr. Mitsunori Misawa, and Dr. Robert Fuller
Abstract: This dissertation investigates how collaborative modality (asynchronous versus synchronous) and collaborative technology (standard tools versus concurrent update tools) affect academic performance, perceived learning outcomes, and collaborative experiences in fully online higher education. Grounded in the Theory of Transactional Distance, the Community of Inquiry framework, and Social Presence Theory, the research addresses gaps in understanding how technology and instructional modality interact to shape collaboration when instructional content, assessments, and group tasks are held constant. Using a quasi-experimental 2Å~2 factorial design, undergraduate business students (n = 242) completed two small-group collaboration assignments in one of four conditions: asynchronous standard, asynchronous concurrent, synchronous standard, or synchronous concurrent. Data sources included objective performance scores, post-assignment surveys measuring perceptions of academic performance and collaborative experience, and demographic information. Analyses using ANOVA, Welch’s ANOVA, Games-Howell post hoc tests, and independent samples t-tests revealed that concurrent update tools were consistently associated with higher academic performance, particularly in asynchronous conditions, and with improved perceptions of group functioning, structure, and tool support. Synchronous conditions supported greater trust, affective connection, and engagement, while asynchronous concurrent conditions demonstrated notable performance advantages. Results indicate that neither collaboration alone nor concurrent update technology in isolation consistently improved outcomes; the most substantial benefits occurred when collaborative activities were purposefully structured and paired with concurrent update tools aligned with task demands and learning objectives. These findings refine and extend existing theoretical frameworks by showing how co-editing platforms can bridge structure, presence, and learner interaction across modalities. Practical implications include designing intentional collaborative activities supported by real-time tools in both synchronous and asynchronous environments, alongside institutional investments in platform access, student training, and learning management system integration. By centering both outcomes and the processes that shape collaboration, this dissertation advances empirical and theoretical understanding of technology-mediated collaboration in online higher education and offers actionable strategies for creating equitable, engaging, and effective digital learning environments.
Learning Designers in Context examines learning design across professional sectors, local cultures, and geographic regions in the Global South, addressing the ways in which practitioners effectively draw on the knowledge, skills, and resources available to them. Around the world, access to and formalization of learning technologies in design has led to a diversity of strategies, competencies, demands, and organizational structures, but no book has yet compiled insights and lessons learned from these living examples to further the development of professionals working across contexts. Exploring design and implementation in higher education, corporate, non-profit, and government sectors while attending to urgent cultural and geographic distinctions, these chapters vividly illustrate the roles, challenges, and opportunities of learning designers use in real-world settings home to specific demographics, traditions, socioeconomic parameters, and policy orientations.
Athabasca University Press recently published our book as part of the Issues in Distance Education series. Feminist Pedagogy for Teaching Online edited by Jacquelyne Thoni Howard, Enilda Romero-Hall, Clare Daniel, Niya Bond, and Liv Newman examines the experiences that interdisciplinary and global feminist educators have had-both their successes and their challenges-in infusing feminist pedagogical tenets into their online teaching and learning practices. The book is available in multiple open access formats, and I hope you will take the opportunity to browse through the chapters and discover how this freely available resource can benefit your organization and members.
About the Book
Instructors across higher education require inspiring and practical resources for creating, adapting to, and enhancing, online teaching and learning spaces. Faculty need to build collaborative, equitable and trusting online learning communities. This edited volume examines the experiences that interdisciplinary and global feminist educators have had-both their successes and their challenges-in infusing feminist pedagogical tenets into their online teaching and learning practices. Contributors consider how to promote connection, reflexivity, and embodiment; build equity, cooperation, and co-education; and create cultures of care in the online classroom. They also interrogate knowledge production, social inequality, and power. By (re)imagining feminist pedagogy as a much-needed tool and providing practical advice for using digital technology to enact these tenets in the classroom, this collection will empower educators and learners alike.
About the Editors
Jacquelyne Thoni Howard is a professor of Practice of Data at the Connolly Alexander Institute for Data Science at Tulane University.
Enilda Romero-Hall is associate professor in the Learning, Design, and Technology program at The University of Tennessee Knoxville.
Clare Daniel is senior professor of practice and director of research at Newcomb Institute of Tulane University, where she teaches in the Department of Communication.
Niya Bond is an online educator, faculty development facilitator, and PhD candidate at the University of Maine studying online teaching and learning.
Liv Newman is administrative assistant professor and Associate Director of the Center for Engaged Learning and Teaching at Tulane University.
A few years ago, Jaigris Hodson, George Veletsianos, and Victoria O’Meara invited me to collaborate on a project titled: Online Harassment as a Barrier to Research Communication: An Intersectional Approach (SSHRC Insight Grant). As part of the collaboration, we worked on the design and development of an online learning course that illustrates the experiences of diverse researchers who are harassed when they communicate their research online.
The goal of the course is to educate others on the different types of online harassment experienced by diverse researchers and to provide an opportunity for stakeholders to engage in perspective taking activities related to online harassment. This training is designed specifically for administrators, to equip you with the knowledge and tools you need to support your faculty. By following the guidelines in this training, we can all be better equipped to contribute to a safe, respectful, equitable, professional, and ethical workplace.
Objectives of the Course
Upon completion of the training, you will be able to:
Name 3 reasons why online harassment may be underreported at your institution.
Examine how adopting a system for supporting faculty during or after an experience of online harassment can improve equity within the department.
Identify the best course of actions to take to support faculty targeted with online harassment.
Distinguish between strategies that you can use to support your faculty vs. strategies that are likely to be unhelpful.
Congrats to Dr. Makhosazana (Khosi) Lunga, completing a Doctor of Philosophy degree in Education with a concentration in Learning Design and Technology at The University of Tennessee Knoxville, for successfully defending your dissertation titled “Understanding Undergraduate Microbiology Instructors Online Course Design Judgement while Living Through the COVID-19 Pandemic”! #GoVols
Committee Members: Dr. Lisa Yamagata-Lynch (Chair), Dr. Boyd, Dr. Larson, and Dr. Romero-Hall
Abstract:
This qualitative, descriptive multiple-case study investigates the online teaching experiences of seven undergraduate microbiology instructors at public universities in South Africa and the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study investigated instructors unfamiliar with online course development to (a) describe how they designed online courses during the COVID-19 pandemic, (b) discover what influenced how they designed those courses, and (c) detail why they made the respective design decisions. It leans into the theoretical tenets of social constructivism and follows a multiple case study approach, relying on interviews and document analysis. Instructors were recruited through criterion-based convenience sampling and snowball methods. They are faculty who traditionally taught in-person large-sized microbiology courses prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. They transitioned to an online learning modality during the pandemic. Despite the differences in these countries’ economies and educational systems, the study findings revealed that participant instructors exercised similar overlapping design judgments as they redesigned their courses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants indicated that they developed courses within the institution’s learning management systems, integrated open educational resources, and utilized various teaching tools, including digital games. They encouraged students to interact and work in teams, enabling them to co-construct their learning. However, instructors wrestled with balancing many teaching demands against anxious students’ expectations. Instructors also grappled with ways to accommodate diverse students’ needs while promoting equity, diversity, accessibility, and inclusion in an online learning environment. Most notably, there was tension between finding efficient ways to maintain rigor and protect assessment integrity while empathizing with students. As demand for online learning increases, the study’s findings aim to make explicit the connection between design judgment research and practice. The goal of this study is to draw attention to instructors’ unconscious assumptions, behaviors, attitudes, thoughts, experiences, beliefs, culture, goals, and skills that influence design decisions, particularly during disruptive events such as the COVID-19 pandemic. It aims to empower the instructional design community members with awareness and sensitivity to what instructors bring with them to the collaborative design process.
Keywords: Authentic Learning Environment, Design Decisions, Design Judgments, Online Learning Environment, Social Constructivism Theory
Congrats to Dr. Aviann Morris for successfully defending your dissertation titled “Factors that Impact the Implementation of HyFlex Learning Environments of Higher Education Institutions within a Caribbean Context”!
Committee Members: Dr. Rob Branch (Chair), Dr. Jill Stefaniak, Dr. Lauren Bagdy, and Dr. Enilda Romero-Hall
Abstract:
Caribbean higher education institutions (HEIs) face unique challenges due to diverse student populations, geographic dispersion, and distinctive socio-economic contexts. Flexible models, such as HyFlex (hybrid-flexible) offer promising opportunities to provide equitable and adaptable educational environments. This study investigated factors influencing successful HyFlex implementation through a mixed-methods approach, including surveys and interviews analyzed via thematic content analysis guided by Activity Systems Theory (AST). Faculty reported challenges with managing dual instructional modalities, effective pedagogy, and technology integration. Institutional leaders noted fragmented administrative structures, regulatory constraints, and the need for decentralized budget systems. The findings emphasize that successful HyFlex adoption requires balancing investments in technological infrastructure and human resource development, alongside interdisciplinary collaboration, comprehensive professional training, and targeted institutional support. These insights inform policymakers and academic leaders aiming to create responsive and inclusive higher education environments.
This post was originally published on AECT Interactions but is no longer available there. However, an archived version can be accessed via the Wayback Machine using this link. As the original author, I wanted to make sure this content remains accessible to ensure continued access to its insights and discussions. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to reach out.
Feminist pedagogies belong in academia, whether incorporated into onsite or online curricula. If this term is new to you, or if you’d like to find out how you might bring feminist pedagogies into your teaching, I welcome you to read on.
I’ll start here: I consider myself an intersectional feminist. As thoroughly discussed by Rosemary Tong, in her book Feminist Thought, feminist theories aim to describe women’s experiences through analyzing patriarchy, sexuality, or other ideologies. Yet it often overlooks the role of race and class. Therefore, feminist theory remains White and its potential to broaden and deepen its analysis by addressing non-privileged women remains unrealized (Crenshaw, 1989). Intersectional feminism views identities as consisting of multiple social dimensions including gender, race, sexuality, and class. As a woman of color—an Afro-Latinx woman—intersectional feminism fully embraces my experiences.
As I learned more about the feminist movement and how some colleagues have embraced feminism in their teaching practice, I quickly realized that because of my intersectional feminist tendencies I had adopted a feminist pedagogy. According to Shrewsbury (1987), feminist pedagogy is a philosophy of teaching/learning processes that guides our choice of classroom practices in which a community of learners is empowered to act responsibly towards one another and the subject matter. Feminist pedagogy also encourages us to apply what we learn to social action.
Intersectional feminism views identities as consisting of multiple social dimensions, including gender, race, sexuality, and class. As a woman of color, an Afro-Latinx woman, intersectional feminism fully embraces my experiences.— Enilda Romero-Hall
FEMINIST PEDAGOGIES IN TEACHING
Here are some ways in which I have embraced intersectional feminist pedagogies in my teaching:
Construction of Knowledge: In my classroom, I view learners as equal contributors to knowledge construction. I encourage my students to reflect on prior experiences and share them during our discussions. The aim is to decentralize knowledge.
Put it into practice: The learners in my courses are empowered and the ‘learner-instructor’ relationship is transformed (e.g. creating an open access book authored by graduate students in a course). I also aim to decolonize knowledge by acknowledging the existence of multiple epistemological frameworks from scholars around the world. Examples of decolonization of knowledge include having a variety of guest speakers, sharing reading lists of non-White authors, and/or amplifying colleagues with global perspectives.
Course Design: When designing a course, I am open to being flexible, recalibrating, and redesigning based on learner inputs. There is a balance in the instructor and learner input to help inform curriculum and classroom practices.
Put it into practice: On the first day of classes, I always state that “the syllabus is not written in stone.” Therefore, it is not uncommon to have changes in the course schedule to provide learners with additional time to work on a project or explore a topic. Also, I aim to identify authentic evidence of learning. Rather than engaging learners in regurgitation of content, I use generative strategies and authentic assessments, enabling learners to show genuine and valid evidence of learning (e.g., a short writing assignment).
Power and Authority: One of the key tenets of feminist theory is to be critical of power: Who has power? Why are they in a position of power? It is important to challenge normalized notions of dominant culture because they often serve to oppress the “others.” The idea is not to give the “façade of equality,” but instead to recognize how power structures are represented in the course and take action to correct it.
Put it into practice: In my HyFlex courses, I have observed this power imbalance, noticing that my synchronous online students may not be able to interject during discussions in the same way onsite students do. Therefore, I make a point to facilitate the discussion in a manner that opens moments in which online students can interject and make a contribution to the discussion.
Dealing with Differences: In this element, the ‘intersectional’ element of feminist theory is critical. Dealing with differences encourages dialogue that helps learners come to realize their own privilege and stereotypes they may have (i.e., race, class, gender, and others). Learners also get to know their classmates and the many different views each person holds.
Put it into practice: For an onsite course, this may be an open conversation between the learners and the instructor at the beginning of the course. In an online course, it’s important to highlight this in course ‘netiquette.’ This is one of the netiquette points I like to include on the main page of my course: “Be sensitive to the fact that online participants represent a wide variety of different political and religious beliefs, as well as cultural and linguistic backgrounds. Disagreeing is fine and even encouraged, but remember that you should aim for rational discourse.”
Community Building: Embracing community-building following a feminist pedagogy framework means valuing solidarity and shared power. The idea emphasizes to the learners how collective action can help empower a group of individuals just like it can empower groups to address inequalities and discrimination faced as individuals in society.
Put it into practice: Community building can be implemented by building equitable learning communities for students who are studying in person or online (Bali, 2021).
I recently joined the curation team of the Feminist Pedagogy for Teaching Online guide (co-curators include: Clare Daniel, Jacquelyne Thoni Howard, Niya Bond, and Liv Newman). The initial founders created it as a resource to assist faculty with the mass transition to remote learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as feminist pedagogies are equally important in online teaching and learning. The guide includes a range of readings, podcasts, and teaching tools that embrace the tenets of feminist pedagogy.
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
Here are additional resources and readings that can also benefit you as you consider feminist pedagogies in your own teaching practice:
Campbell, K. (2015). The feminist instructional designer: An autoethnography. In B. Hokanson, G. Clinton, & M. Tracey (Eds.) The design of learning experience. Educational communications and technology: Issues and innovations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16504-2_16
A space for national and international dialogue around experiences and research that address and generate knowledge about the impact of digital technologies and media on gender equality and women’s well-being.
I decided to focus the plenary on a discussion about a forthcoming book that my colleagues and I co-editing titled Feminist Pedagogy for Teaching Online. With that in mind, I invited several of the book chapter authors to join the plenary session and together we embarked on a wonderful journey!
Our plenary is titled: “Critical Conversations in Online Education: a Deep Dive into the Feminist Pedagogy for Teaching Online Book”. You can watch the plenary presentation on YouTube:
Presenters: Niya Bond (University of Maine): Using Feminist Pedagogy to (Re)Imagine Online Classrooms (Introduction)
Bridget Kriner (Cuyoga Community College): Building Participatory Spaces in Online Classrooms (Chapter 5)
Design Goodiness 
You must be logged in to post a comment.